Recently Featured | Most Discussed | Most Recent | Most Responded | Most Viewed | Top Favorites | Top Rated | TV Serials | Trailers | Recently Watched
Cardinal Cajetan, the Canon, and the lack of clarity in Turretinfan
This ad will close in 15 seconds
Rate:

6 ratings
Views:
140
From : gnrhead
Added: May 31, 2009
A response to a video that Turretinfan has made in regards to my video on Cardinal Cajetan. Mr. Fan not only mispronounces Cajetan, giving his "American"ized slant to the pronunciation, but he continues in his blunders. We'll examine his claims here Tomas de Vio Cajetan COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF ESTHER The Church receives such books, permitting the faithful to read them, the Church also reads them in her offices on account of the many devout things which they contain. But the Church obliges no one necessarily to believe what is contained therein, which is the case with the books of Wisdom, Sirach, Maccabees, Judith, and Tobit. For though these books are received by Christians, and proof derived from them may, in some way or other, have weight, because the Church retains those books; yet they are not effectual for proving those things which are in doubt, against heretics or Jews. We here terminate our commentaries on the books of Judith, Tobit, and the Maccabees, which are reckoned by Jerome without the canonical books, and are placed among the apocrypha, together with Wisdom and Sirach as appears in his Prologus Geleatus. Nor should you be disturbed, o novice, if you should anywhere find those books reckoned among the canonical books, either in the holy councils, or in the holy doctors. For the words of the councils, as well as of the doctors, are to be submitted to the correction of Jerome, and according to his judgment to the bishops CHROMATIUS and HELIODORUS, those books are not canonical, that is, they are not those which are given as a rule for the confirmation of the faith. They may, however, be called canonical for the edification of the faithful; since they are received and authorized in the Canon of the Bible for this purpose
Category : Education
Added: May 31, 2009
A response to a video that Turretinfan has made in regards to my video on Cardinal Cajetan. Mr. Fan not only mispronounces Cajetan, giving his "American"ized slant to the pronunciation, but he continues in his blunders. We'll examine his claims here Tomas de Vio Cajetan COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF ESTHER The Church receives such books, permitting the faithful to read them, the Church also reads them in her offices on account of the many devout things which they contain. But the Church obliges no one necessarily to believe what is contained therein, which is the case with the books of Wisdom, Sirach, Maccabees, Judith, and Tobit. For though these books are received by Christians, and proof derived from them may, in some way or other, have weight, because the Church retains those books; yet they are not effectual for proving those things which are in doubt, against heretics or Jews. We here terminate our commentaries on the books of Judith, Tobit, and the Maccabees, which are reckoned by Jerome without the canonical books, and are placed among the apocrypha, together with Wisdom and Sirach as appears in his Prologus Geleatus. Nor should you be disturbed, o novice, if you should anywhere find those books reckoned among the canonical books, either in the holy councils, or in the holy doctors. For the words of the councils, as well as of the doctors, are to be submitted to the correction of Jerome, and according to his judgment to the bishops CHROMATIUS and HELIODORUS, those books are not canonical, that is, they are not those which are given as a rule for the confirmation of the faith. They may, however, be called canonical for the edification of the faithful; since they are received and authorized in the Canon of the Bible for this purpose
Category : Education
Related Videos

Video Categories:
Also Try:






